We are seeing patients in-person and through Video Visits. Learn more about how we’re keeping you safe and please review our updated visitor policy. Please also consider supporting Weill Cornell Medicine’s efforts to support our front-line workers.
Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center

Warning message

The subscription service is currently unavailable. Please try again later.

You are here

News

Vahdat presents promising new treatment for triple negative breast cancer

Friday, December 9, 2016

This is an excerpt of a story that appeared in OncLive. Read the whole article here.

Photo of Linda Vahdat, M.D.Linda Vahdat, M.D. Treatment with sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) was well-tolerated and induced durable responses, some lasting longer than 1 year, for heavily pretreated patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), according to findings from an ongoing phase I/II study presented at the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS).

In the single-arm trial, the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 30% with sacituzumab govitecan, and the duration of response was 8.9 months (95% CI, 6.1-11.3). The median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.0-7.3) and the median overall survival was 16.6 months (95% CI, 11.1-20.6).

"The findings are truly outstanding," said senior study author Linda T. Vahdat, M.D., MBA, from Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital. "The confirmed response rate is near 30%, and what's really striking is that this is a group of patients with a median of 5 prior regimens for breast cancer—it is a very heavily pretreated population."

Sacituzumab govitecan is an antibody-drug conjugate that consists of the active metabolite of irinotecan, SN-38, linked with a humanized IgG antibody targeted against TROP-2, a cell-surface glycoprotein that is expressed in more than 90% of TNBC. The ongoing study enrolled 69 patients with relapsed/refractory metastatic TNBC. 

The complete response (CR) rate with sacituzumab govitecan was 3% and the partial response (PR) rate was 28%. Additionally, 45% of patients had stable disease (SD), with 16% of the responses lasting for ≥6 months. The clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD ≥6 months) was 46%. After a median follow-up of 16.6 months, 7 patients continued to receive therapy, with 6 continuing to respond at the time of the analysis. There were 3 durable responses that lasted 13 to 21 months.

"These aren't just flash in the pan type of responses, they are actually quite durable," said Vahdat. "When you have a drug that you can keep someone on in triple-negative breast cancer for almost a year you get excited, because the median survival in TNBC is a little under a year."

Data from the ongoing phase I/II study will be submitted to the FDA for a potential accelerated approval, according to the poster presented at SABCS. This submission would be completed under a breakthrough therapy designation received in February 2016 for the medication in TNBC following at least 2 treatments for metastatic disease. A phase III study is currently being planned under a special protocol agreement with the FDA.