News

How not to end cancer in our lifetimes

Monday, April 4, 2016

This editorial by Dean Laurie Glimcher, M.D., first appeared in the Wall Street Journal. Read the original here.

Photo of Dean Laurie GlimcherDean Laurie Glimcher President Obama calls the quest to cure cancer the “moon shot” of his presidency. However if the federal government has actually its way, this rocket might never ever leave the launchpad.

The demand is sweeping changes proposed by the Obama administration to the rules that govern the usage of human tissue in research. The government says the adjustments are required “to modernize, strengthen, and make a lot more efficient the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects.” However the adjustments would certainly protect no one and serve just to sluggish the speed of innovation and discovery, thus harming countless patients and making a cure for cancer much less likely.

At present, people that participate in certain categories of clinical studies should provide informed consent. Researchers discuss along with participants the nature of the study and pros and cons of taking part. As soon as personally determining post is collected as portion of the study, subjects obtain detailed post on exactly how their privacy will certainly be protected.

The Department of Healthiness and Human Solutions and several others departments and agencies now wish to prolong the need of patient consent to a fairly various category of studies relating to the usage of tissue called biospecimens. This is tissue that remains after a medical procedure or diagnostic test has actually been completed. Believe of the leftover part of blood samples taken throughout a bodily or the spare tissue removed throughout a biopsy.

Existing rules currently mandate that leftover biospecimens destined for research are stripped of post that would certainly identify the individual they came from. It is extraordinarily challenging to re-identify this tissue, and HHS acknowledges that the risk is low. Institutions currently have actually research review boards that approve and monitor exactly what scientists are permitted to do along with these materials.

This anonymous material can easily have actually tremendous value for medical research. It has actually played a role in learning health problem and will certainly undoubtedly result in much better therapies for cancer, heart disease, neurological disorders, autoimmune health problem and others conditions.

The consents proposed by the administration are called broad consent, which provide the patient little a lot more compared to a generic menu of feasible uses for the tissue. If patients are disconcerted by these broad consents or don’t already know them, they might well decline to authorize them. The unintended effect will certainly be fewer biospecimens for scientific endeavor. Controlling the paperwork of these consents will certainly produce an immense bureaucratic burden that will certainly likewise sluggish innovation.

Health-care providers would certainly be expected to obtain brand-new biospecimen consents from every patient, every 10 years. Every doctor’s office will certainly have actually to produce a system for collecting, storing and reporting consent documents. At Weill Cornell Medicine, we estimate it could expenditure as a lot as $4 million annually to comply along with the expanded regulations. The danger is that currently overburdened offices will certainly opt out and just throw away their scientifically beneficial biospecimens.

Implementing a needlessly more complex consent procedure will certainly make it harder for patients and researchers to contribute to science. The brand-new rules will certainly curtail access to the biospecimens called for to accomplish the president’s “moon shot” to cure cancer and others necessary health-care goals.